Every person , whether natural or juridical apply redress in the courts of law for the imposition of justice in all given up situation . The court represented by the gauge is seen as the final arbiter who puts an end to some(prenominal)(prenominal) given controversy where both parties lay down their positions and arguments and leaves it up to the judge to decide on the matter based on an object lens and non subjective attitudeI agree with the above inverted comma butterfly that a strong duty of loyalty should be practice only when it is transcend that the parties agree on it . When there is throw evidence to the contrary , the courts should not obligate the parties to perform whatsoever duty not agreed upon by the partiesIt would be an injustice to force a ships company who is not in match with the proposition of t he case to act in accordance with a duty not agreed upon by them .
This will transcend to speculations of the court acting in a biased boldness since it would often result to a case where the other caller is forced to perform something favorable to the other . The courts should weigh both circumstance by listening and asking for evidence from both parties with equal opportunities given on both sides . It would be buy the farm to force the other party to act in paying attention with an alleged agreement where the evidence clearly points to the fact that much(prenominal) was not freely and voluntarily agreed upon by both partiesIt w ould however...If you pauperism to get a fu! ll essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay